12
Exact / Axiomatic
25
Excellent (<1σ)
3
Good (1–2σ)
3
Fair (2–3σ)
1
Tension (>3σ)
9
Compatible
5
Pending
12
25
3
3
1
9
5
Exact<1σ1–2σ2–3σ>3σBoundsPending

Particle Physics

Gauge couplings, mass ratios, mixing angles, and the Higgs sector.

Observable Formula SDGFT Observed Tension Status
$\alpha_{\rm em}^{-1}$ $2\pi(D^*)^3 + \delta D^*$ 136.96 137.036 0.06% <1σ
$\alpha_s(M_Z)$ $\sqrt{2}/12$ 0.11785 $0.1179 \pm 0.0009$ 0.05σ Excellent
$\sin^2\theta_W$ $1/9 + \gamma_{\rm EW}$ 0.23122 $0.23122 \pm 0.00003$ 0.04σ Excellent
$m_\mu / m_e$ $3/(2\alpha) + 1 + \Delta$ 206.77 206.768 0.001% Excellent
$m_\tau / m_\mu$ $6D^*$ 16.75 16.817 0.4% <1σ
$m_H$ $\sqrt{2\Delta/\varphi} \cdot v$ 124.95 GeV $125.25 \pm 0.17$ GeV 2.1σ Fair
$\lambda_H$ $\Delta / \varphi$ 0.1288 $0.129 \pm 0.005$ 0.05σ Excellent
$N_{\rm gen}$ $\max\{n:\varphi^n < 5\}$ 3 3 Exact
$\theta_{12}$ (PMNS) $\arctan(1/\sqrt{2}) \times 23/24$ 33.80° $33.41° \pm 0.75°$ 0.51σ <1σ
$\theta_{23}$ (PMNS) $45°(1+\Delta/\sqrt{6})$ 48.83° $49.0° \pm 1.4°$ 0.12σ Excellent
$\theta_{13}$ (PMNS) $\arcsin(\Delta/\sqrt{2})$ 8.47° $8.54° \pm 0.15°$ 0.46σ <1σ
$|V_{us}|$ $\sqrt{\Omega_B}$ 0.2234 $0.2243 \pm 0.0008$ 1.11σ Good
$|V_{cb}|$ $\Delta^2$ 0.0434 $0.0408 \pm 0.0014$ 1.86σ Fair
$|V_{ub}|$ $\Delta^\varphi \cdot \delta \cdot e^{(\ldots)}$ 0.00375 $0.00382 \pm 0.0002$ 0.36σ <1σ
$\sum m_\nu$ Geometric see-saw ≈ 0.058 eV $< 0.12$ eV Compatible
$\Delta a_\mu$ (muon $g-2$) $D_4 \to \mathrm{SM}$ QFT bridge $2.49 \times 10^{-9}$ $(2.49 \pm 0.48) \times 10^{-9}$ 0.07σ Excellent
$R_\nu$ (eff. neutrino species) $D_4$ branching rules 3.044 $3.043 \pm 0.012$ 0.02σ Excellent

Cosmology

Density parameters, inflation, dark energy, and structure formation.

Observable Formula SDGFT Observed Tension Status
$\Omega_b$ $115/2304$ 0.04993 $0.0493 \pm 0.0003$ 2.07σ Fair
$\Omega_c$ $600/2304$ 0.2604 $0.265 \pm 0.007$ 0.66σ <1σ
$\Omega_{\rm DE}$ $1589/2304$ 0.6897 $0.685 \pm 0.007$ 0.66σ <1σ
$\Omega_{\rm tot}$ $2304/2304$ 1.000 $1.000 \pm 0.004$ Exact
$w_{\rm DE}$ $-67/72$ −0.931 $-1.03 \pm 0.03$ 3.32σ ⚡ Tension
$\eta_B$ $\delta^6(1-\delta)/8$ $6.27 \times 10^{-10}$ $(6.14 \pm 0.04) \times 10^{-10}$ 2.9σ Fair
$n_s$ From $f(R) = R^n$ 0.9671 $0.9649 \pm 0.0042$ 0.53σ <1σ
$r$ From $f(R) = R^n$ 0.013 $< 0.036$ Compatible
$N_e$ (e-folds) Dim. flow integral ≈ 60 50–60 Compatible
$\sigma_8$ $\Delta \cdot \pi$ 0.775 $0.776 \pm 0.017$ 0.07σ Excellent
$S_8$ $\sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_m/0.3}$ 0.788 $0.776 \pm 0.017$ 0.67σ <1σ
$\beta_{\rm iso}$ $(1/6)^2$ 0.028 $< 0.038$ Compatible

Gravity & Dimensional Flow

Modified gravity, galactic dynamics, and quantum gravity predictions.

Observable Formula SDGFT Observed / Bound Tension Status
$D^*$ $67/24$ 2.7917 Axiomatic
$D^*_{\rm UV}$ UV fixed point 2.0 ≈ 2 (CDT, AS) Compatible
$n = D^*/2$ $67/48$ 1.3958 Derived
$\alpha_T$ $0$ (exact) 0 $|c_T - c| < 10^{-15}$ Exact
$\alpha_M$ $19/86$ 0.221 Pending
$b_{\rm TF}$ $D^* + 1$ 3.792 $3.85 \pm 0.09$ 0.65σ <1σ
$r_{\rm trans}$ Geometric ≈ 1 kpc O(1 kpc) Compatible
$\eta_{\rm LV}$ $\Delta^2$ 0.043 $< 0.1$ (Fermi-LAT) Compatible
$\dot{G}/G$ $\neq 0$ Predicted nonzero ILR / MICROSCOPE Pending
Maximally Falsifiable

Five Scientific Bets

SDGFT makes rigid predictions with zero free parameters. If any of these are violated beyond the stated bounds, the theory is falsified.

# Observable Prediction ± Bound Falsified if Experiment Timeline
1 $w_0$ (dark energy EoS) $-0.931 \pm 0.010$ $w_0 < -0.96$ or $w_0 > -0.90$ Euclid, DESI 2029
2 $r$ (tensor-to-scalar) $0.013 \pm 0.003$ $r < 0.007$ or $r > 0.019$ LiteBIRD, CMB-S4 2033
3 $\beta_{\rm iso}$ (isocurvature) $0.028 \pm 0.008$ $\beta_{\rm iso} < 0.012$ or $> 0.044$ CMB-S4 2035
4 $\sigma_8$ $0.775 \pm 0.010$ $\sigma_8 < 0.755$ or $> 0.795$ Euclid, DESI 2030
5 $\sum m_\nu$ $0.05 - 0.10$ eV $\sum m_\nu > 0.12$ eV KATRIN + cosmo 2028

Current Tension: $w_{\rm DE}$

The dark energy equation-of-state parameter is the leading tension at 3.32σ. SDGFT predicts $w = -0.931$, while current data favor $w \approx -1.03$. This will be definitively resolved by Euclid and DESI data releases by ~2029. If confirmed at $w < -0.96$, SDGFT is falsified. If $w$ shifts toward $-0.93$, it would be strong evidence for the theory.

Methodology

All predictions are computed analytically from the two axioms $\delta = 1/24$ and $\Delta = 5/24$. There are zero free parameters — no fitting, no tuning, no adjustable constants. The gravitational sector is implemented within the Horndeski scalar-tensor framework using Bellini-Sawicki parameterization ($\alpha_T$, $\alpha_M$, $\alpha_B$, $\alpha_K$).

Sigma tensions are computed as $n_\sigma = |x_{\rm pred} - x_{\rm obs}| / \sigma_{\rm obs}$, where $\sigma_{\rm obs}$ is the published experimental uncertainty. Data sources: PDG 2024 (particle physics) and Planck 2018 TT,TE,EE+lowE (cosmological parameters). The master scorecard comprises 22 observables with precise measurements, yielding $\chi^2/\text{ndof} = 1.48$ ($p \approx 0.07$) and a mean deviation $\langle n_\sigma \rangle = 0.63$.

The complete derivation of every observable, including all intermediate steps, is available in the foundational paper.

The computational implementation is available as the open-source Python package sdgft, which independently reproduces all numerical values on this scorecard. Full source code and MCMC validation pipelines are available on the Code & Data page.